The new wave of temporary work reached Germany in 1962, although it was not a German company that brought about this development, but a company from Switzerland called ADIA Interim, which provided temporary work internationally and now also wanted to operate in Germany.
It wasn't long before the first difficulties arose with temporary work. The Federal Labour Office held the monopoly on job placement. It now saw this monopoly threatened by ADIA Interim and filed a criminal complaint in court
The case made it all the way to the Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe. There, in 1967, the course was set for the entire future of temporary employment in Germany in response to this development. This was done with the judgement that the supply of temporary workers is fundamentally compatible with the right to free choice of occupation.
The government also addressed the new problem and enacted the Act on the Regulation of Commercial Temporary Employment (AÜG). This primarily served to guarantee minimum social protection for temporary workers and stipulated the obligation to obtain a licence for the provision of temporary employment services.
Further regulations on temporary work
Further regulations followed over the years in response to individual developments on the market. In 1982, for example, the Temporary employment in the construction industry banned. This was the result of numerous violations of applicable laws in this industry. The duration of temporary workers was also increased for all other sectors in 1985. Whereas a maximum of 3 months applied before this time, the new regulation stipulated a maximum of 6 months. This was intended to make temporary work itself more attractive for all parties involved, i.e. intermediaries, hirers and the temporary workers themselves.
But even the 6 months still restricted the supply of temporary workers too much. For this reason, the maximum permissible period was extended to 9 months in 1994. In the same year, the monopoly of the Federal Labour Office in the field of job placement was also ended. This meant that commercial employment agencies were now also permitted.
However, it is interesting to observe how the maximum duration of temporary employment has increasingly become the focus of temporary work. After all, it only took until 1997 for a reform of the AÜG to increase the maximum to 12 months. However, anyone who thinks that this is the last time we will be looking at the duration of temporary employment is way off the mark.
This was followed by legislation on modern labour market services. In the course of this, the maximum duration of temporary employment was extended to 24 months. The Mittelstandsvereinigung Zeitarbeit e.V. (MZV) was also founded.
"Hartz proposals"
Then came the so-called "Hartz proposals" in 2004. These abolished the maximum duration for temporary employment. The ban on synchronisation and the ban on re-employment also disappeared. In return, however, equalisation of key working conditions was introduced, particularly with regard to pay.
However, there is a loophole for the principle of equal treatment. This equal treatment principle can be replaced by a collective labour agreement. There have been enough such collective agreements between the parties in the temporary employment sector to make the situation a little confusing.